I wrote this piece for an Advent series for my church with the theme of hope.
*
Important note on the text: As
I wrote this piece I consulted my dad, heavily, who co-wrote the second and
fourth paragraphs and assisted in other edits as well. Thanks dad,
for your contributions as well as pointing me to this book in the
first place!
I
consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the
glory that will be revealed in us.
19
The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons [and daughters]
of God to be revealed. 20
For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice,
but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope
21
that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay
and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.
22
We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of
childbirth right up to the present time.
23
Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the
Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons
[and daughters], the redemption of our bodies.
24
For in this hope we were saved. (Romans
8:18, italics added)
In Wright's Surprised by Hope, he asserts that this bodiless heaven is not actually a biblical notion, stating that "there is very little in the Bible about 'going to heaven when you die'" (18). The way that I had viewed the ultimate Christian hope – an other-worldly, bodiless existence – appears to be how most Christians perceive it today, but this is not the way hope is framed in the bible. Instead this is a view which finds a home in the minds of the ancient Greek philosophers, most notably Plato (427-347BCE). This philosophy of a bodiless hope is what Paul encountered famously in Acts 17 when he, in presenting the gospel of the resurrected Jesus, was sneered at. The Athenians thought the idea of resurrection absurd. They were longing for the day to finally be free from the prison of the body. Who would want a resurrection? Wright advocates that this Platonic view, although clearly not the view of early Christians, became popular hundreds of years after Christ as the Greek mindset gained a stronghold in the church (Gnosticism) and continues to be widely accepted today. Christians today have replaced what the early church believed—that our ultimate hope lie in resurrection – with a soul-admittance-only heaven, far away from this material existence. (Yes there is an interim period after death where without our bodies we are with Christ. But this is not pictured in the bible as our final destiny; it is a period of waiting, waiting for resurrection.) Whenever the kingdom of heaven is mentioned by Jesus, it "refers not to post mortem destiny, not to our escape from this world into another one, but to God's sovereign rule coming 'on earth as it is in heaven'" (18). Heaven, as explained by Wright (and please, just go read the book for a much more detailed explanation), "is not a future destiny but the other, hidden, dimension of our ordinary life--God's dimension, if you like. God made heaven and earth; at the last he will remake both and join them together forever" (19). Heaven and earth are interwoven, so to speak, in a way that we can't understand: "God's space and ours interlock and intersect in a whole variety of ways even while they retain, for the moment at least, their separate and distinct identities and roles" (116).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/124e4/124e4387312ac8fc3cf39a1782bbf5252dd134c8" alt=""
Once the skewed, popular version of heaven collapses, the Christian hope is no longer focused on leaving; the Christian mission, then, is not about saving some immaterial part of human beings – their souls – but is much more holistic than that. Our bodies, says Paul, are scheduled for redemption and our mission, therefore, is about participating in God’s mission to redeem and transform the whole of the created order. Wright explains that "because the resurrection has happened as an event within our own world, its implications and effects are to be felt within our own world, here and now" (191). The hope of this redemption doesn't rely on the ability of humans to accomplish it; neither are we to imagine somehow that the slow process of evolution will eventually bring us to utopia. But this does not mean we are tasked with nothing to do but sit back and relax until God completes this transformation. In the words of Wright:
To
hope for a better future in this world--for the poor, the sick, the
lonely and depressed, for the slaves, the refugees, the hungry and
the homeless, for the abused, the paranoid, the downtrodden and
despairing, and in fact for the whole wide, wonderful, and wounded
world--is not something else,
something extra, something tacked on to the gospel as an
afterthought. And to work for that immediate hope, the surprising
hope that comes forward from God's ultimate future into God's urgent
present, is not a distraction
from
the task of mission and evangelism in the present. It is a central,
vital, and life-giving part of it. (191-192)
Wright
insists that what you do now "will
last into God's future"
(193); that activities such as teaching, building schools, seeking
justice--even painting or making music for God "are part of what
we may call building
for God's kingdom"
(193). As stated previously, it's not that we, as humans, are
capable, by our own determined efforts to bring in the
new heaven and new earth--the
Bible is very clear that only God is able to complete this
transformation--but we can be assured that the work we do now will
somehow have a place in God's kingdom. As Wright points out, at the
end of 1 Corinthians 15 when Paul is addressing resurrection at
length, he doesn't tell his readers to sit back and relax until God
brings it all about; he says: "Always give yourselves fully to
the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is
not in vain" (1 Corinthians 15:58). Your passions, be it
baptizing or finding homes for the homeless, is not in vain; it is
valuable, it is vital, and it is important work towards God's
kingdom.As I sat on that chair in 2013, I tried to focus on the hope the tattoo was representing: skeleton alongside creation, representing myself, long gone, but waiting for my bodily resurrection. Together we wait, creation and I, for God's final transformation of new heaven and new earth. Today it reminds me that passions and desires that have long been mine, to heal this world in much more physical ways than soul-saving, to express myself through music and art, are not something bolted onto the side of real Christian mission but are central and integral to the work of proclaiming God’s kingdom. While I realize permanently etching this concept on my thigh doesn't scream great idea to many--hey, maybe it won't be there when we're all like, transformed and stuff.
Works
Cited
Wright,
N.T. Surprised
by Hope.
New York: HarperCollins, 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment